Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 594 SW2D 385 - McCormick v. Waters

McCormick v. Waters’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
2
states following
February 2015
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently February 2015 · most notably Eaton v. McLain (1994), Doe v. Linder Const. Co., Inc. (1992)

2 federal appellate · 27 state decisions

1201980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 22 Tenn. App. 70 - Gargaro v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co. · Ill. Cent. R. Co. v. Nichols · Paradiso v. Kroger Company · Stringer v. Cooper · O'Brien v. Smith Bros. Engine Rebuilders, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This duty of the owner or occupier of the land arises from the position of control which this person in possession occupies; he is the person normally best able to prevent any harm to others. See Paradiso [v. Kroger Co., 499 S.W.2d 78 (Tenn.App.1973) ], supra. This same position of superior knowledge and control gives rise to the requirement that the possessor of land exercise ordinary or reasonable care to provide a reasonably safe place for the performance of work by employees. Stringer v. Cooper and Cooper Office Equipment, Inc., 486 S.W.2d 751 (Tenn.App.1972).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]hen an invitee is injured because of dangers that are obvious, reasonably apparent, or as well known to the injured party as to the owner or operator of the premises, liability, if any should be determined in accordance with the principles of comparative fault analysis and the general negligence law of this state.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.