Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 594 SW2D 449 - Ex Parte Moore

Ex Parte Moore’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
March 2013
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 2013

9 state decisions

601980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on White v. State · Ex Parte Clear · Mears v. State · Ex Parte Paul · Ex Parte Davis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Any person ... accused of a felony less than capital in this State, committed while on bail for a prior felony for which he has been indicted, ... after a hearing, and upon evidence substantially showing the guilt of the accused of the offense ... committed while on bail ..., may be denied bail pending trial by a district judge in this State....””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “1. A defendant must be indicted for a felony and be out of jail on bond: 2. A defendant must be then accused of committing, while on that bond, a felony less than capital in this state; 3. A defendant must be arrested on the accusation in 2; 4. A district judge must hold a hearing wherein the state must show substantial evidence of the defendant’s guilt for the felony in 2 and the district judge must enter an order denying bond, all within seven days of the defendant’s arrest in 2.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.