Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 595 F.2d 462 - Blech v. United States

Blech v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

595 F.2d 462 · 1979

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
1
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently October 2015 · most notably United States v. Author Services, Inc. (1986), Laino v. United States (1980)

20 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

21019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 7421 · 26 U.S.C. § 7605 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201

Relies on Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Enochs v. Williams Packing & Navigation Co. · Bob Jones University v. Simon · Atlas Roofing Co. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission · United States v. Dema

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[N]o suit for the purpose of restraining the assessment or collection of any tax shall be maintained in any court by any person, whether or not such person is the person against whom such tax was assessed.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “To hold otherwise would enable ingenious counsel to so frame complaints as to frustrate the policy or purpose behind the Anti-Injunction Statute_ Likewise, this statutory ban against judicial interference with the assessment and collection of taxes “is equally applicable to activities which are intended to or may culminate in the assessment or collection of taxes.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “`intended to or may culminate in the assessment or collection of taxes'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.