United States v. Lindsey’s Empirical Analysis
595 F.2d 5 · 1979
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently July 2014 · most notably Minnesota v. Block (1981), Free Enterprise Canoe Renters Ass'n v. Watt (1983)
15 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kleppe v. New Mexico · United States v. Alford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t is well established that [article IV, section 3, clause 2 of the United States Constitution] grants to the United States the power to regulate conduct on non-federal land when reasonably necessary to protect adjacent federal property”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“regulations issued by the Secretary of Agriculture.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.