Clark v. Riley’s Empirical Analysis
595 F.3d 1258 · 2010
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on City of Cleburne Texas v. Cleburne Living Center · Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc. · Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc. · Gregory v. Ashcroft · 602 So. 2d 344 - IMED Corp. v. Systems Engineering Assoc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We review de novo the district court's grant of a motion to dismiss under 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim, accepting the allegations in the complaint as true and construing them in the light most favorable to the plaintiff.” Clark v. Riley, 595 F.3d 1258, 1264 (11th Cir.2010) (citation omitted). 3 .Because H & P’s alleged act of defamation occurred in Minnesota, Minnesota state law applies here. See Ungaro-Benages v. Dresdner Bank AG, 379 F.3d 1227, 1232 (11th Cir.2004) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.