Helcher v. Dearborn County’s Empirical Analysis
595 F.3d 710 · 2010
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 47 U.S.C. § 332
Relies on Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay · DiLeo v. Ernst & Young · Fields v. Bleiman · United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Espinosa · Sprint Spectrum Lp Pcs v. Willoth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When an action presents more than one claim for relief — whether as a claim, counterclaim, crossclaim, or third-party-claim — ... the court may direct entry of a final judgment as to one or more, but fewer than all, claims ... only if the court expressly determines that there is no just reason for delay. Otherwise, any order or other decision, however designated, that adjudicates fewer than all the claims ... does not end the action as to any of the claims ... and may be revised at any time before the entry of a judgment adjudicating all the claims....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.