Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 595 F.3d 937 - Sternberg v. Johnston

Sternberg v. Johnston’s Empirical Analysis

595 F.3d 937 · 2009

Citation profile

65
cited by 65 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362

Relies on Fogerty Fantasy Inc · 37 Cal. 3d 813 - Brandt v. Superior Court · Bloom v. Bloom · 1993-1 Hillis Motors Inc v. Hawaii Automobile Dealers' Association · In Re Del Mission Limited

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The automatic stay is one of the fundamental debtor protections provided by the bankruptcy laws. It gives the debtor a breathing spell from his creditors. It stops all collect tion efforts, all harassment, and all foreclosure actions. It permits the debtor to attempt a repayment or reorganization plan, or simply to be relieved of the financial pressures that drove him into bankruptcy. The automatic stay also provides creditor protection. Without it, certain creditors would be able to pursue their own remedies against the debtor’s property. Those who acted first would obtain payment of the claims in preference to and to the detriment of other creditors. Bankruptcy is designed to provide an orderly liquidation procedure under which all creditors are treated equally. A race of diligence by creditors for the debtor’s assets prevents that.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “can recover as actual damages only those attorney fees related to enforcing the automatic stay and remedying the stay violation, not the fees incurred in prosecuting the bankruptcy adversary proceeding in which he pursued his claim for those damages”). But see In re Repine, 536 F.3d 512, 522 (5th Cir.2008) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Once the violation has ended, any fees the debtor incurs after that point in pursuit of a damage award would not be to compensate for 'actual damages' under § 362(k)(1),”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.