595 F. Supp. 2d 161 - Strahan v. Holmes’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 16 U.S.C. § 1531 (§ 2 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973) · 16 U.S.C. § 1532 (§ 3 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973) · 16 U.S.C. § 1538 (§ 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973) · 16 U.S.C. § 1539 (§ 10 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973) · 16 U.S.C. § 1540 (§ 11 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973)
Relies on Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hill · Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter, Communities for Great Ore. · National Wildlife Federation v. Burlington Northern Railroad · Strahan v. Coxe · Aw Chesterton Company Inc v. W Chesterton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.