Commonwealth v. Olmeda-Rivera’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 2009
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Estelle v. Smith · Mitchell v. United States · Com. v. Olmeda-Rivera
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he matter is REMANDED for the Superior Court to address Petitioner’s argument that the sentence imposed by the trial court violated his Fifth Amendment rights under Estelle v. Smith, 451 U.S. 454 , 101 S.Ct. 1866 , 68 L.Ed.2d 359 (1981), and Mitchell v. United States, 526 U.S. 314 , 119 S.Ct. 1307 , 143 L.Ed.2d 424 (1999).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.