Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 595 Pa. 483 - Commonwealth v. West

Commonwealth v. West’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently February 2026 · most notably Commonwealth v. Hackett (2008), 2013 Pa. Super. 89 - Commonwealth v. Taylor (2013)

25 state decisions

160200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Commonwealth v. Lantzy · Commonwealth v. Peterkin · Commonwealth v. Pounds · Commonwealth v. Hughes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Pennsylvania courts have previously followed Barker in resolving claims that procedural delays in criminal cases constitute a substantive due process violation, and we have set forth a four prong test in which we inquire as follows: (1) whether the delay itself is sufficient to trigger further inquiry; (2) if so, the reason for the delay; (3) whether the defendant timely asserted his rights, and; (4) whether there is any prejudice to the defendant from the delay.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.