595 So. 2d 1052 - Clay v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 1994
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Borges v. State · 356 So. 2d 315 - State v. Harris · 575 So. 2d 1262 - State v. Rodriguez · 463 So. 2d 1136 - State v. Phillips
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[h]aving established that the existence of prior DUI [Driving Under the Influence] convictions is an essential element of felony DUI, it necessarily follows that the requisite notice of prior DUI convictions must be given in the charging document.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Young v. State“prior thefts must be alleged in the charging document and proved in all instances before an accused may be found guilty of felony petit theft.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Young v. State“must allege the elements of the felony petit larceny statute in its charging document if it intends to proceed under section 812.014(2)[(d)].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Young v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.