Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

595 So. 2d 1117

Coleman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1992-04-08

Relies on 316 So. 2d 267 - Williams v. State · 392 So. 2d 54 - Jolly v. State · 508 So. 2d 473 - Meredith v. State

Decided 1992-04-08

PER CURIAM.

¶1After review of the record and initial brief, we conclude that appellant has failed to demonstrate a preliminary basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s order summarily, pursuant to rule 9.315(a), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.. This affirmance is, however, without prejudice to appellant filing a motion in the trial court to withdraw his plea. See Meredith v. State, 508 So.2d 473 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Fox v. State, 510 So.2d 310, 312 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Jolly v. State, 392 So.2d 54 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). See also Williams v. State, 316 So.2d 267 (Fla.1975).

DOWNEY, LETTS and WARNER, JJ., concur.
/595/so2d/1117 · .json · Public domain