Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 595 SO2D 1264 - Hobbs v. Gorman

Hobbs v. Gorman’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 2017

10 state decisions

60199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Elrod v. Burns · Carey v. Piphus · Hohe v. Casey · Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co. · 555 So. 2d 1370 - South Cent. Bell Telephone Co. v. PSC

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “rights. However, we held that even if the plaintiff had suffered a violation of his constitutional rights, he was not entitled to a preliminary injunction since he had an adequate remedy for damages compensable in money. We noted that in both South Central Bell, supra, and Elrod, supra, the prevailing parties had successfully established the threat of”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.