Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 595 SO2D 16 - Thompson v. State

Thompson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
September 2010
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently September 2010

12 state decisions

90199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos. · 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · MacArthur Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp. · California v. Prysock

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the police must somehow communicate to the accused the basic idea of the right to consult a free attorney before being questioned.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The erroneous admission of statements obtained in violation of Miranda rights is subject to harmless error analysis.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.