Lippman v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 1994
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. DiFrancesco · 572 So. 2d 1368 - Larson v. State · 483 So. 2d 420 - State v. Johnson · 579 So. 2d 109 - Clark v. State · 559 So. 2d 1139 - State v. Warren
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. Whether an order modifying probation by prohibiting contact between probationer and victim or victim's minor siblings (for the purpose of protecting the victim and siblings) constitutes an additional punishment proscribed by the double jeopardy clause? 2. Where a probationer is undergoing psychiatric treatment for a sexual offense as a condition of probation, does a probation modification order prohibiting contact between probationer and victim or victim's minor siblings constitute a modification of an existing probation condition or an additional punishment proscribed by the double jeopardy clause?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a form of community supervision requiring specified contacts with parole and probation officers and other terms and conditions as provided in s. 948.03.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.