Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 595 SO2D 212 - Doe v. State

Doe v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
3
states following
January 2007
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ex parte Garland · 336 So. 2d 93 - Johnson v. State · Singleton v. State · Marsh v. Garwood · 531 So. 2d 1344 - Sandlin v. Criminal Justice Standards & Training Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “been adjudicated guilty of any of the charges stemming from the arrest or alleged criminal activity to which the records expunction petition pertains.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[b]ecause a full and unconditional pardon legally blots out the finding of guilt, the pardon removes all the attendant legal consequences which flow from an adjudication of guilt. The pardonee is no longer legally considered `convicted' or `adjudicated guilty' of that crime.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[w]hen the pardon is full, it remits the punishment and blots out of existence the guilt, so that in the eyes of the law the offender is as innocent as if he never committed the offense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.