State v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 2007
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 338 So. 2d 584 - State v. Crosby · 406 So. 2d 160 - State v. McKinney · 419 So. 2d 463 - State v. Jenkins · State v. Lamark · 461 So. 2d 503 - State v. Price
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[b]ecause LSA-C.Cr.P. Art. 895.1 is clear that the sentencing court must announce the payment formula in ordering restitution under a payment plan, we remand the case with instructions that a specified payment schedule be imposed if restitution is ordered.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Dean
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.