Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

595 So. 2d 582

Martinez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1992-03-25

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 1993

2 state decisions

Relies on 592 So. 2d 767 - Tillman v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1992-03-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the denial of Mr. Martinez’s motion to suppress. We strike condition 6 from the written order of probation because it does not conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement at sentencing. Tillman v. State, 592 So.2d 767 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). The written order of probation is otherwise affirmed.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PARKER and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.
/595/so2d/582 · .json · Public domain