State v. Martin’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
82 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 83 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably 637 So. 2d 1012 - State v. Davis (1994), 776 So. 2d 1134 - State v. Bright (2000)
82 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Simmons v. United States · Neil v. Biggers · Manson v. Brathwaite · Burks v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1) The witness's opportunity to view the criminal at the time of the crime; 2) The degree of attention paid by the witness during the commission of the crime; 3) The accuracy of any prior description; 4) The level of certainty demonstrated at confrontation; and 5) The time between the crime and the confrontation.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Patrick · State v. Duncan“when reviewing a trial court's ruling on a motion to suppress, we will consider the entire record, including the testimony presented at trial. E.g., State v. Seward, 509 So.2d 413 (La.1987); State v. Phillips, 444 So.2d 1196 (La.1984); State v. Smith, 332 So.2d 773 (La.1976).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sherman“We have considered [the witness's] testimony at the suppression hearing and his subsequent trial testimony, the latter completely at odds with the former.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sherman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.