Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 595 SO2D 825 - Soderquist v. Kramer

Soderquist v. Kramer’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
3
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently September 2018

1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

80199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sanders v. Hercules Sheet Metal, Inc. · Plaquemines Par. Com'n Council v. Delta Dev. Co. · Oller v. Sharp Electric, Inc. · 500 So. 2d 397 - City of Baton Rouge v. Stauffer Chemical Co. · Braud v. New England Ins. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “have the force and effect of substantive law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “if its existence or nonexistence may be essential to plaintiffs cause of action under the applicable theory of recovery. Facts are “material” if they potentially insure or preclude recovery, affect the litigants’ ultimate success or determine the outcome of a legal dispute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “situations where the attorney's interest is adverse to that of his client ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.