Bolden v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently October 2012
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ex Parte Cofer · United States v. Dothard · Ex Parte Arthur · 440 So. 2d 1155 - Brewer v. State · 507 So. 2d 972 - Anonymous v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`Evidence of prior [or subsequent] bad acts of a criminal defendant is presumptively prejudicial to the defendant.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Under the identity exception to the general exclusionary rule prohibiting the admission of other or collateral crimes as substantive evidence of the guilt of the accused, the prior crime is not relevant to prove identity unless both that and the now-charged crime are ` signature crimes' having the accused's mark and the peculiarly distinctive modus operandi so that they may be said to be the work of the same person .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Baker“[t]he appellant was positively identified by Bill Warnick, the cashier, both at trial and in a police lineup.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bolden v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.