Daniels v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
97 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 97 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably 630 So. 2d 521 - Hale v. State (1993), State v. Christian (1997)
97 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 515 So. 2d 161 - Carawan v. State · 438 So. 2d 1 - Palmer v. State · 476 So. 2d 165 - State v. Carney · 491 So. 2d 1120 - Murray v. State · 559 So. 2d 210 - State v. Boatwright
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 97 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because the statute prescribing the penalty for Daniels' offenses does not contain a provision for a minimum mandatory sentence, we hold that his minimum mandatory sentences imposed for the crimes he committed arising out of the same criminal episode may only be imposed concurrently and not consecutively.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[B]y enacting sections 775.084 and 775.0841, Florida Statutes (Supp.1988), the legislature intended to provide for the incarceration of repeat felony offenders for longer periods of time. However, this is accomplished by enlargement of the maximum sentences that can be imposed when a defendant is found to be an habitual felon or an habitual violent felon.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“A trial judge does not have the discretion under sections 775.021(4) and 775.084, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1988), to impose consecutive fifteen-year minimum mandatory sentences for first-degree felonies committed by an habitual violent felony offender arising from a single criminal episode.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.