Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 595 So. 2d 976 - Hicks v. State

595 So. 2d 976 - Hicks v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 1994
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · 383 So. 2d 1186 - Beugnet v. Beugnet · 531 So. 2d 161 - Poore v. State · State v. Webb · 383 So. 2d 219 - Eutsey v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “shall not be increased after such imposition.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.