Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 595 SW2D 587 - Vallance & Co. v. De Anda

Vallance & Co. v. De Anda’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
7
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

2 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently August 2014

2 district · 10 state decisions

701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stewart v. Basey · Better Food Markets, Inc. v. American District Telegraph Co. · 130 Ga. App. 363 - Orkin Exterminating Co. v. Stevens · Central Alarm of Tucson v. Ganem · 138 N.J. Super. 137 - Abel Holding Co. v. American Dist. Telegraph Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'It would be unreasonable to expect appellant to assume the responsibilities arising under a burglary insurance policy upon payment of . thie] nominal [monthly burglar alarm services] fee.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “contracting parties can limit their liability in damages to a specified amount,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.