State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
February 1995
most recently cited
4 federal appellate · 23 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Duren v. Missouri · State v. Hawkins · State v. Mazzeri · State v. Beavers · State v. Rogers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The testimony of the victim is not considered to be ‘clouded with doubt’ or ‘extremely doubtful’ ... merely because she falls into inconsistencies or contradictions as to minor points of a nonessential nature. In the present case, all of the matters of which defendant complains relate to relatively unimportant details. No discrepancy appears as to the essential elements of the crimes of rape and sodomy.” Id. at 776 [3, 4].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Woods
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.