Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 595 U.S. 302 - United States v. Tsarnaev

United States v. Tsarnaev’s Empirical Analysis

2022

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
June 2026
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3591 (§ 60002 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994) · 18 U.S.C. § 3593 (§ 60002 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994)

Relies on Gall v. United States · Thomas v. Arn · Gregg v. Georgia · Cuyler v. Sullivan · Kyles v. Whitley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[n]otorious crimes are 'almost, as a matter of necessity, brought to the attention' of those informed citizens who are 'best fitted' for jury duty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[L]ower courts cannot create prophylactic supervisory rules that circumvent or supplement legal standards set out in decisions of this Court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[w]hatever the 'supervisory power' entails, it does not countenance [our court's] use of it”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.