Babcock v. Kijakazi’s Empirical Analysis
2022
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 10216 · 10 U.S.C. § 113 (Military Child Care Act of 1989) · 10 U.S.C. § 723 · 26 U.S.C. § 3121 (Federal Insurance Contributions Act) · 32 U.S.C. § 709 (National Guard Technicians Act of 1968) · 38 U.S.C. § 101 (Agent Orange Act of 1991) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 410 (§ 210 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co. · Astrue v. Ratliff · Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Mineta · Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T Inc. · Petersen v. Astrue
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.