Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 596 A2D 511 - Johnson v. United States

Johnson v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 2009
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Giles v. District of Columbia · Belton v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “failure to comply with this requirement does not compel exclusion of the report if it is otherwise admissible, nor is such a failure per se reversible error. Only when the breach of the five day requirement results in prejudice to the defense is a new trial required.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Under Belton , prejudice may be established by a prompt objection by counsel upon receiving the DEA-7 at trial, and a request for time to review it in order to determine whether to challenge it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “was prejudiced by being deprived of an opportunity to decide whether to call the chemist for cross-examination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.