Taylor v. Hopper’s Empirical Analysis
596 F.2d 1284 · 1979
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently October 2001
7 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Faretta v. California · Holloway v. Arkansas · Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCann · Von Moltke v. Gillies
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a trial judge should engage in a dialogue with such a defendant, explaining to him the consequences of defending pro se.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.