Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 596 F.2d 428 - With v. Amador

With v. Amador’s Empirical Analysis

596 F.2d 428 · 1979

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
February 1999
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently February 1999

3 federal appellate · 1 district ·

120197919801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Local Loan Co. v. Hunt · Davis v. Aetna Acceptance Co. · Irving Trust Company v. Bowditch · Young v. Higbee Co. · McIntyre v. Kavanaugh

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This rule does not deal with the burden of going forward with the evidence. Subject to the allocation by the rule of the initial burden of producing evidence and the ultimate burden of persuasion, the rule leaves to the courts the formulation of rules governing the shift of the burden of going forward with the evidence in the light of such considerations as the difficulties of proving the nonexistence of a fact and of establishing a fact as to which the evidence is likely to be more accessible to the bankrupt than to the objector. [Citations omitted.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]o apply section 50A-9-505 under such circumstances to enable appellants to avoid the consequences of their wrong doing ... would be incompatible with not only the spirit of the statute but with the equity that must characterize bankruptcy proceedings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “BURDEN OF PROOF IN OBJECTING TO DISCHARGE. At the trial on a complaint objecting to a discharge, the plaintiff has the burden of proving the facts essential to his objection.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.