Reeves v. Reed’s Empirical Analysis
596 F.2d 628 · 1979
Citation profile
13 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently May 1990
13 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mullaney v. Wilbur · Cupp v. Naughten · Henderson v. Kibbe · United States v. Park · Boyd v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a single instruction to a jury may not be judged in artificial isolation, but must be viewed in the context of the overall charge.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“based on reason and common sense arising out of some or all of the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.