Cook v. Hanberry’s Empirical Analysis
596 F.2d 658 · 1979
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently July 2017 · most notably Kendrick v. Bland (1984), 113 Wis. 2d 514 - Bin-Rilla v. Israel (1983)
7 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · Roe v. Wade · Preiser v. Rodriguez · DeLyra v. United States · Coffin v. Reichard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Assuming arguendo that his allegations of mistreatment demonstrate cruel and unusual punishment, the petitioner still would not be entitled to release from prison. The appropriate remedy would be to enjoin continuance of any practices or require correction of any conditions causing him cruel and unusual punishment. See Preiser v. Rodriguez, 1973, 411 U.S. 475 , 499, 93 S.Ct. 1827 , 1841, 36 L.Ed.2d 439 , 455; Williams v. Edwards, 5 Cir.1977, 547 F.2d 1206 , 1212; Mead v. Parker, 9 Cir.1972, 464 F.2d 1108 , 1111; Konigsberg v. Ciccone, W.D.Mo.1968, 285 F.Supp. 585 , 589, aff'd, 8 Cir.1969, 417 F.2d 161 , cert. denied, 1970, 397 U.S. 963 , 90 S.Ct. 996 , 25 L.Ed.2d 255 ; Coffin v. Reichard, 6 Cir.1944, 143 F.2d 443 , cert. denied, 1945, 325 U.S. 887 , 65 S.Ct. 1568 , 89 L.Ed. 2001 . See also Note, “Prison Conditions as Amounting to Cruel and Unusual Punishment,” 51 A.L. R.3d 111 , 126 (1973); Note, “Developments in the Law of Habeas Corpus,” 83 Harv.L.Rev. 1038 , 1084 (1970). Cf. Armstrong v. Cardwell, 6 Cir.1972, 457 F.2d 34 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.