United States v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
596 F.2d 842 · 1979
Citation profile
35 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably United States v. Long (1983), United States v. Faust (1988)
35 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 641 (Livestock Fraud Protection Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 665 · 29 U.S.C. § 501 · 42 U.S.C. § 1450
Relies on Saia v. United States · Johnson v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. · Hall v. United States · United States v. Evans · United States v. Collins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'substantial federal interest' sufficient to satisfy the elements of section 641 is present when the government has 'title to, possession of or control over' the object in question.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“were deposited in trust with the agency to be held and disbursed in accordance with the terms, conditions, and provisions of the above mentioned legislation and regulations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“maintain detailed financial records, file annual financial and progress reports, and adopt government-prescribed financial management systems”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.