Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 596 F.3d 260 - Dillon v. Rogers

Dillon v. Rogers’s Empirical Analysis

596 F.3d 260 · 2010

Citation profile

178
cited by 178 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E

Relies on Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp. · Jones v. Bock · Woodford v. Ngo · Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc. · V. C O Churner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 178 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “discussed at length above. Id. at 265 . The warden then has 40 days to respond. Id. at 265-66 . If the inmate is dissatisfied with the warden's response, or no response is received within the 40-day time period, the inmate may proceed to the second step and appeal to the Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections. Id. at 266 . Critically, a prisoner who does not receive a timely response to his initial ARP is not prevented from filing a second-step ARP. See id. ; LA. ADMIN. CODE tit. 22, pt. I, § 325(J)(1)(c) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Summary judgment is proper 'if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Exhaustion resembles personal jurisdiction and venue in that it is an affirmative defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.