Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 596 F.3d 751 - Bixler v. Foster

Bixler v. Foster’s Empirical Analysis

596 F.3d 751 · 2010

Citation profile

108
cited by 108 later decisions
1
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 26 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Warth v. Seldin · Sedima Sprl v. Imrex Company Inc · Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 108 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'it remains for the court to consider whether the unchallenged facts constitute a legitimate cause of action, since a party in default does not admit mere conclusions of law.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[T]o state a claim under civil RICO, the plaintiff is required to show that a RICO predicate offense “not only was a ‘but for’ cause of his injury, but was the proximate cause as well.” Proximate cause for RICO purposes ... should be evaluated in light of its common-law foundations; proximate cause thus requires “some direct relation between the injury asserted and the injurious conduct alleged.” A link that is “too remote,” “purely contingent,” or “indirect]” is insufficient.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.