596 F. Supp. 1107 - Howard v. Marsh’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 5 U.S.C. § 552A (§ 3 of the Privacy Act of 1974)
Relies on Borders v. Reagan · Parks v. United States Internal Revenue Service · Hernandez v. Alexander
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[n]o agency shall disclose any record ... to any person ... except pursuant to a written request by, or with the prior written consent of the individual to whom the record pertains”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Howard v. Marsh“to those officers and employees of the agency which maintains the record who have a need for the record in the performance of their duties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Howard v. Marsh“directly or indirectly, under the jurisdiction of the head of that part of the agency in which the complaint arose”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Howard v. Marsh
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.