596 F. Supp. 130 - Tweet v. Webster’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 2013
2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson · Data Disc, Inc. v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc. · Max W. Forsythe, Helen H. Forsythe, E. Bush Hayden and Jean Mulliken v. D. H. Overmyer · Greenspun v. Del E. Webb Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the principal purpose of which [was] to protect its own contingent liability under the contract.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dogra v. Liles“control the method, means or place of settlement negotiations”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dogra v. Liles
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.