596 F. Supp. 768 - Johnson v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently September 2006
5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Warth v. Seldin · Caplin v. Marine Midland Grace Trust Co. of New York · Bonhiver v. Graff · Norton v. Liddel · Ralston v. Robinson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Colorado law provides that uncertainty as to the amount of damages does not bar recovery so long as the existence of damage is factually established.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.