Mickens v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
April 2006
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Langley v. State · Johnson v. State · Mickens v. State · Phillips v. State · Mickens v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Iwlhen a post-conviction. court does not find waiver and denies the petition on other grounds, if the petitioner appeals the State can argue waiver in its appellee's brief without filing a cross-appeal on the issue.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Bunch v. State · Walker v. State“[If a praecipe rather than a motion to correct error is filed by a party in the trial court, the opposing party may raise any grounds as crossg-errors ... in the appellate brief....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“Waiver is an affirmative defense to a petition for post-conviction relief. The State therefore must present a waiver claim before a court can find waiver.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Walker v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.