Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 596 NE2D 896 - Roche v. State

Roche v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
December 2009
most recently cited

25 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Payne v. Tennessee · Pulley v. Harris · Walton v. Arizona · Booth v. Maryland · MacArthur Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[NlJo meaning should be interpreted from the jury's failure to reach a recommendation. Likewise, the failure to reach a recommendation should not be considered as a mitigating factor during the penalty phase.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Where the jury's verdict is supported by independent evidence of guilt such that upon review we are satisfied that there was no substantial likelihood that the evidence in question played a part in appellant's conviction, any error in its admission is harmless.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “this court has twice held over vigorous dissent, including that of the author of this opinion, that a jury's inability to reach a recommendation need not be considered as a mitigating cireumstance and has no effect upon subsequent court sentencing procedure.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.