Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 596 NW2D 278 - Luthen v. Luthen

Luthen v. Luthen’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
November 2014
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Loth v. Loth · Marriage of Karon v. Karon · Costley v. Caromin House, Inc. · Johnson v. Johnson · Justis v. Justis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the motion to intervene was timely; (2) an interest relating to the property or transaction that is the subject of the action; (3) as a practical matter, disposition of the action may impair or impede the party’s ability to protect that interest; and (4) the party is not adequately represented by the existing parties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “There is no legal authority to support the contention that a child born out of wedlock is entitled to a portion of the father’s marital property for the purposes of child support.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.