State v. Ambaye’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
June 2000
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Scott · United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co. · Berkery v. Commissioner · State v. C. A. · 417 Pa. Super. 192 - Com. v. WP
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A petition may be filed under section 609A.03 to seal all records relating to an arrest, indictment or information, trial, or verdict * * * if all pending actions or proceedings were resolved in favor of the petitioner.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ambaye“respondent. See id. at 670 . The court of appeals reasoned that because a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity arguably prevents the state from retrying a defendant for the same crime, the verdict”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ambaye“language is that a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity is not a resolution”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ambaye
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.