Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 596 NW2D 72 - Roling v. Daily

Roling v. Daily’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
3
states following
October 2011
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Salem v. United States Lines Company · 27 Cal. 3d 916 - Molien v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · 87 Wash. 2d 424 - Hunsley v. Giard · Nesler v. Fisher and Co., Inc. · Barnhill v. Davis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]o the extent the motion is based on a discretionary ground, we review it for an abuse of discretion. But if the motion is based on a legal question, our review is on error.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.