Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 596 P2D 1154 - Gray v. State

Gray v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
5
states following
April 2010
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently April 2010

21 state decisions

13019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Carroll v. United States · Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. Hayden · Gerry v. United States · Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Determination of the requisite voluntariness of the disputed consent is a question of fact to be determined from all the circumstances. Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 , 93 S.Ct. 2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973); Sleziak v. State, 454 P.2d 252 (Alaska 1969). On appeal from the trial court’s denial of a suppression motion, the evidence taken at the hearing is viewed in the light most favorable to the state. Anthony v. State, 521 P.2d 486, 492 (Alaska 1974). The person giving the consent need not be advised of the right to refuse to allow a search prior to executing a valid consent to search, although the subject’s awareness of the right to refuse is a factor in the determination of the volun-tariness of the consent. Schneckloth, 412 U.S. at 227 , 93 S.Ct. at 2047 , 36 L.Ed.2d at 863 , and Sleziak, 454 P.2d at 259 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.