In Re QV’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 144 N.C. App. 550 - Archer v. Rockingham County · State v. Vardiman · 126 N.C. App. 764 - Matter of Van Kooten · Harris v. BOARD OF COM'RS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY · American Ripener Co. v. Tolson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“provide[] a uniform set of jurisdictional rules and guidelines for the national enforcement of child custody orders[.]”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Jws · Palmer v. Cline“[t]he jurisdictional requirements of the [Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act] must be satisfied for a court to have authority to adjudicate . . . petitions filed pursuant to our Juvenile Code, even though the Juvenile Code provides that the district courts of North Carolina have exclusive, original jurisdiction over any case involving a juvenile.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.