Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 596 So. 2d 1034 - Pace v. State

596 So. 2d 1034 - Pace v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently January 2018

1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

50199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on King v. Lynaugh · Griffin v. Texas · Steinhorst v. State · Watson v. Louisiana · Richardson v. Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “germane to that witness' testimony and plausibly relevant to the theory of defense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he aggravating circumstances of previous convictions of felony involving violence, committed while on parole, and committed while engaged in a robbery are all supported beyond a reasonable doubt. The trial judge found no statutory mitigating circumstances and, after reviewing the nonstatutory mitigating evidence, concluded that none of the suggested mitigating factors had been established. Considering the totality of the circumstances, we conclude that the record supports the trial judge's conclusion. Accord Floyd v. State, 569 So.2d 1225 (Fla.1990). Even if one or more nonstatutory mitigating factors were wrongfully rejected, we are persuaded beyond a reasonable doubt that the weight thereof was so insignificant that the trial judge would have imposed death. Because the aggravating circumstances outweigh any nonstatutory mitigating evidence, death is the appropriate penalty. Accord Eutzy v. State, 458 So.2d 755 (Fla.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1045 , 105 S.Ct. 2062 , 85 L.Ed.2d 336 (1985); Johnson v. State, 438 So.2d 774 (Fla.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1051 , 104 S.Ct. 1329 , 79 L.Ed.2d 724 (1984).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.