Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 596 So. 2d 1167 - Lundy v. State

596 So. 2d 1167 - Lundy v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently May 2017

17 state decisions

90199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Yates v. United States · 515 So. 2d 161 - Carawan v. State · 328 So. 2d 40 - In Re Tierney · Arnold v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to hold that a separate possessory crime is committed for each packet or package of the controlled substance within an offender's possession at a given time and place goes well beyond the statutory elements of the crime. To allow such an arrest would lead to absurd scenarios, including the state's charging more counts for the same amount of narcotics only due to the increased number of small packages of that illegal substance.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a defendant may not be convicted of both trafficking, by possession, and of simple possession of the same drugs.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.