Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 596 So. 2d 1216 - Pausch v. State

596 So. 2d 1216 - Pausch v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 2017

14 state decisions

50199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Estelle v. McGuire · Rodriguez v. New York · 110 So. 2d 654 - Williams v. State · Ree v. State · 382 So. 2d 150 - Food Fair, Inc. v. Anderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the jury . . . could not have reasonably been expected to isolate and extract from the recording that which was admissible as evidence of the crime while disregarding the aspersions of guilt created by [the detective's] words.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Pausch never admitted responsibility for the death of her son. She simply asserted that Christopher must have fallen to the floor while asleep. [Detective] Bonsall disbelieved her story and accused her of lying, and of abusing her son. Bonsall persistently condemned Pausch as an unfit mother, and predicted that if Christopher returned to her care, she would eventually kill him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “We agree that Pausch should have advanced a more specific objection to the tape recording, but we nonetheless find that the error fundamentally undermined the fairness of her trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.