Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 596 SO2D 126 - Expicare Nursing Services v. Eudaley

Expicare Nursing Services v. Eudaley’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2003
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 527 So. 2d 266 - Peters v. Armellini Exp. Lines · 454 So. 2d 46 - Daytona Linen Service v. Davis · 286 So. 2d 557 - Riddle v. BREVARD COUNTY BD. OF PUB. INSTRUCTION · 500 So. 2d 193 - Ralosky v. Dynamic Builders, Inc. · Coleman v. Burnup & Sims, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, the average weekly wages of the injured employee at the time of the injury shall be taken as the basis upon which to compute compensation and shall be determined, subject to the limitations of s. 440.12(2), as follows: (a) If the injured employee has worked in the employment in which he was working at the time of the injury, whether for the same or another employer, during substantially the whole of 13 weeks immediately preceding the injury, his average weekly wage shall be one-thirteenth of the total amount of wages earned in such employment during the 13 weeks.... (b) If the injured employee has not worked in such employment during substantially the whole of 13 weeks immediately preceding the injury, the wages of a similar employee in the same employment who has worked substantially the whole of such 13 weeks shall be used in making the determination under the preceding paragraph. (c) If an employee is a seasonal worker and the foregoing method cannot be fairly applied in determining the average weekly wage, then the employee may use, instead of the 13 weeks immediately preceding the injury, the calendar year or the 52 weeks immediately preceding the injury.... (d) If any of the foregoing methods cannot reasonably and fairly be applied, the full-time weekly wages of the injured employee shall be used, except as otherwise provided in paragraph (e) or paragraph (f).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “fall-back provision where none of the prior subsections apply.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.