State v. Yarbrough’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently October 2018
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 484 So. 2d 122 - State v. Fraser · 420 So. 2d 1126 - State v. Graham · State v. Chaney · 458 So. 2d 454 - State v. Martin · 440 So. 2d 828 - State v. Broadway
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in its jury instructions. The Third Circuit found no error in the charge, as it tracked the language of La. R.S. 14:27, the phrase was not singled out or unduly emphasized, and the charge as a whole was a complete and correct statement of law. In the present case, after review of the subject charge, we find, like the Court did in Yarbrough , that the trial court properly instructed the jury as to the definition of”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Devillier
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.